Papers: Difference between revisions

From Arbeitsgruppe Kuiper
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Klarer geschrieben)
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
== Discs ==
== Discs ==
<!-- === 08.12.23 === -->
<!-- === 08.12.23 === -->
* Higginbottom et al. 2023, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06042 State-of-the-art simulations of line-driven accretion disc winds: realistic radiation-hydrodynamics leads to weaker outflows]
* Nixon et al., [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04400 "On the role of numerical diffusivity in MHD simulations of global accretion disc dynamos"]
* Nixon et al., [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.04400 "On the role of numerical diffusivity in MHD simulations of global accretion disc dynamos"]


Line 34: Line 36:
== Small things ==
== Small things ==
<!-- === 05.12.23 === -->
<!-- === 05.12.23 === -->
* Dominik and Dullemond 2023, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06000 "The bouncing barrier revisited: Impact on key planet formation processes and observational signatures"]
* Houge et al., [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01856 "Surviving the Heat: multi-wavelength analysis of V883 Ori reveals that dust aggregates survive the sublimation of their ice mantles"]
* Houge et al., [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.01856 "Surviving the Heat: multi-wavelength analysis of V883 Ori reveals that dust aggregates survive the sublimation of their ice mantles"]


== Other ==
== Other ==
* Dib & Menou, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02091 "Physics simulation capabilities of LLMs"]
* Dib & Menou, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.02091 "Physics simulation capabilities of LLMs"]

Revision as of 13:00, 12 December 2023

Interesting papers can be put here. It would be useful to:

  • Put the title and maybe author names
  • Put a link to the abstract page, not to the PDF, to allow preview before downloading (very useful with slow connexions, and also for easy access to the ADS page with the published version when coming back to this later)
  • Maybe sort by subject (e.g.: Stars, Discs, Planets, Dust/rocks/pebbles, Other) instead of day, since the latter quickly becomes irrelevant
  • Within a subject, maybe sort by descending chronological order, to have the newest on top

I implemented this boldly---please review/improve this (maybe drop the division by topic since there will be ambiguous cases? or indicate the month?), delete this line, and delete the dates commented out in the Wiki source if they are not needed anymore. Danke!

Stars

Discs

Planets

Small things

Other